Quote Originally Posted by cgriff View Post
Ok, but at least *you* recognize the embarrasing, certainly non-useful nature of complaining about Disney management for a decision that they haven't made and may never make, right? [There has been no official communication regarding any Wishes cutbacks].
It was used as an example of how Disney views these cutbacks

From Merriam-Webster online:
Main Entry: ex·am·ple
Pronunciation: \ig-ˈzam-pəl\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French essample, example, from Latin exemplum, from eximere to take out, from ex- + emere to take — more at redeem
Date: 14th century
1: one that serves as a pattern to be imitated or not to be imitated <a good example> <a bad example>
2: a punishment inflicted on someone as a warning to others ; also : an individual so punished
3: one (as an item or incident) that is representative of all of a group or type
4: a parallel or closely similar case especially when serving as a precedent or model
5: an instance (as a problem to be solved) serving to illustrate a rule or precept or to act as an exercise in the application of a rule
I believe #4 is the one that fits this situation.

The examples you give yes Mansion was hit out of the park but was only done because the ride was literally falling apart.

Pirates I'm sorry to say was a miss IMHo sticking in 4 AA's while removing a seen at the end that was costly to maintain is more of a subtraction that an edition. It was watsed money that could have been used elsewhere. The attraction was fine the way it was no update was needed to dumb it down for people who couldn't comprehend the movie was based on the attraction not the other way around.