Rumors

DizneyFreak2002;2498937 wrote: Hideous is being nice... That thing is a travesty...

The stupid things sticking out on the top of the tower look like they are made of plastic. It looks like something a little kid would design. The color scheme is awful.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

DizneyFreak2002;2498923 wrote: Magic Kingdom rumor:

Building off Zippy 1.... MK getting an expansion... Frontierland expansion...

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Filling in Rivers of America?

GotG? I cannot figure out the accronym! Please help!
Not a rumor but observed 'update'....what is with the silver and blue rocks in tomorrow land ? Looks horrible. To me it took a beautiful backdrop and turned it tacky......

disney obsessed;2498957 wrote: GotG? I cannot figure out the accronym! Please help!
Not a rumor but observed 'update'....what is with the silver and blue rocks in tomorrow land ? Looks horrible. To me it took a beautiful backdrop and turned it tacky......

Guardians of the Galaxy

All good stuff! I light of relatively recent improvements at MK (Fantasyland) and in process improvements at AK and HS, Epcot is in dire need of a shot in the arm. We love Epcot and don't mind so much that there isn't much in the way of "rides" in the World Showcase, but there needs to more draw up front in Future World.

BrerGnat;2498924 wrote: I'm not a fan of any more obscure Marvel branding in the parks. Disney seems to be making a lot of short sighted decisions lately regarding their Marvel properties. I mean, putting Dr. Strange into the kids club on the Fantasy cruise ship is just weird (how many kids under 12 even saw that movie?) And then this dumb GotG overlay at DCA Tower of Terror, which was completely unnecessary due to almost constant long lines there. I just feel like putting GotG into Epcot is just a huge mistake. It does need more rides, that is a given, but it's like they are forcing this movie into parks where it doesn't belong.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

yes!!!!!!

OFF TOPIC: And I'm going to share what I think will be a very unpopular opinion and go on to say that I'm not even happy with them putting Star Wars in DL. I get that they have to put it somewhere, I just wish it did not have to be in that place in that park. Anyone else concerned about this?

cer;2498979 wrote: yes!!!!!!

OFF TOPIC: And I'm going to share what I think will be a very unpopular opinion and go on to say that I'm not even happy with them putting Star Wars in DL. I get that they have to put it somewhere, I just wish it did not have to be in that place in that park. Anyone else concerned about this?

See, this one doesn't bother me at all. The location they are putting it lends itself well to a land themed to be a sort of forest planet trading post. Looking at the concept art, it will mesh well. Since Disneyland park is a combination of lands with different themes, I think it will fit just fine. What will be weird is having Star Tours in Tomorrowland...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

barnaby;2498951 wrote: Filling in Rivers of America?

Not all of it, just the back part.... That was part of the rumor...

disney obsessed;2498957 wrote: GotG? I cannot figure out the accronym! Please help!
Not a rumor but observed 'update'....what is with the silver and blue rocks in tomorrow land ? Looks horrible. To me it took a beautiful backdrop and turned it tacky......

The new color scheme? Part of a slow make over of Tomorrowland....

Speedy1998;2498912 wrote: I think he was only there for testing before he was sent to his permanent home in Hong Kong Disneyland for it's opening in 2005.

Too bad, they should bring him back ... of course they could create a creature from Avatar to walk amongst us ..... just sayn'

Wait, wait wait!!!!! What do you mean 'makeover of tomorrowland'???????

Well, you've got to admit Tomorrowland is no longer very "futuristic"

BrerGnat;2498986 wrote: See, this one doesn't bother me at all. The location they are putting it lends itself well to a land themed to be a sort of forest planet trading post. Looking at the concept art, it will mesh well. Since Disneyland park is a combination of lands with different themes, I think it will fit just fine. What will be weird is having Star Tours in Tomorrowland...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

I sure hope so. I have not seen the concept art, so I am just going to take your word for it.

Dulcee;2499011 wrote: Well, you've got to admit Tomorrowland is no longer very "futuristic"

'Daybeforeyesterdayland'

It's pretty much "Retro-Tomorrowland" currently. It's difficult to remove and/or replace things that people have come to know and love, even if, and when, they become passe or outdated.

What really would/should/could be in Tomorrowland currently? What are we looking forward to that could fit in a Disney inspired world? There has been a lot of looking backward in the Disney family of late (sequels, remakes [live-action and otherwise], etc.) , and not a lot of looking forward.