Is it just me, or is the new Jasmine costume the most ridiculous thing ever? It doesn't even look like the movie character anymore. It looks like she's walking around wearing light blue pajamas she raided from her grandma's closet. What's next? Putting Ariel in a 1920s era swimsuit? Tarzan in a 3-piece suit? Tinkerbell in a baggy sweatsuit? As ridiculous as those suggestions are, they're no worse than the reasoning behind the Jasmine retool.
It's not just you, I think it's a bit much. Again caving to PC.
- Lynn -
INTERCOT Staff: Theme Parks, DVC
When we were there last fall everyone was complaining about it. They need to stay true to the movies. Otherwise the ruin the character. IMO
I'm sorry that I'm not following - does this mean she has too little or too much clothing on? I will reserve judgement until I hear the answer.
:-)
"You used all the glue on purpose!"
Her new outfit covers her entire body from neck down.
Zippy 1;2503706 wrote: Her new outfit covers her entire body from neck down.
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
I mean, come on! Think of the children! And the dads!
"You used all the glue on purpose!"
It just looks like something straight out of Party City.
MattHolst;2503711 wrote: It just looks like something straight out of Party City.
Really? Because most female costumes at Party City barely cover anything.
But I think what you're meaning is the quality of the costume.
"You used all the glue on purpose!"
