So, so disappointed.
"You used all the glue on purpose!"
Huh? What is it?
Natalie
INTERCOT Staff: Disneyland Resort-California, The Water Cooler
I am guessing Good Dinosaur wasn't Good? LOL
Nanc
Nanci Rossetti
Vacation Specialist
Magical Journeys
http://www.yourmagicaljourneys.com
The Magic begins with YOU!
The Official Travel Agency of INTERCOT.com
Nothing can be worse than Cars 2...
Natalie
INTERCOT Staff: Disneyland Resort-California, The Water Cooler
You're right. Cars 2 was pretty bad. Are we still even allowed to think of it as a Pixar movie?
Heather aka ibelieveindisneymagic
INTERCOT Staff
Engaged at the castle!
My Disney Home is POFQ
I would have said Wall-e. To be worse than that must be horrible.
Kerry823;2474538 wrote: I would have said Wall-e. To be worse than that must be horrible.
I love wall e!! I also heard from a friend the good the dinosaur was fantastic.
"One little spark of inspiration is at the heart of all creation, right at the start of everything thats new, one little spark lights up for you!"
ºoº
Mom to our little Prince Everett and Princess Adelaide
August 2020 Caribbean Beach!
Not all treasure is silver and gold, mate.
We saw a brief preview of The Good Dinosaur at DHS a few weeks ago and all I can say about it is "Meh". :down:
Ed
Senior Imagineer Emeritus
Welcome to the INTERCOT forums !
I took my 9 year old son yesterday to see it. It wasn't bad at all. Pretty good. Aesthetically, just amazing and definitely Pixar's most realistic portrayal of the natural world. The story was basic but done well. If anything, the movie was weird and kind of disjointed and more intense than I expected. There was one scene that I felt was completely unnecessary and inappropriate that referenced getting high. Otherwise I would give it a solid 3 out of 5 stars.
Natalie
INTERCOT Staff: Disneyland Resort-California, The Water Cooler
The Good Dinosaur may not be Pixar's best, but it is way, way better than Cars 2. That was a total turkey. I loved Cars, but the sequel was a poor effort at trying to capitalize on merchandising without a very good storyline. Pixar should be ashamed at that one.
1971 (age 15) MK was new!
1974 off-site (Senior Trip)
1982 off-site
1988 off-site
May 2002 AS-Sports, with DW & kids
May 2004 Pop Century
Feb 2005 Wilderness Lodge
Oct 2006 Pop Century
Oct 2008 Camped at Fort Wilderness
Feb 2010 Cruise on the Wonder
Dec 2014 POFQ for Christmas!
BrerGnat;2474585 wrote: and definitely Pixar's most realistic portrayal of the natural world.
There's this movie you should really see called "Finding Nemo." :-)
"You used all the glue on purpose!"
On Rotten Tomatoes it currently sits at 77 percent. The only ones worse are Cars 2, naturally, and Cars, at 74 percent - but I would argue Cars is far, far better than The Good Dinosaur.
"You used all the glue on purpose!"
Mendelson;2474620 wrote: There's this movie you should really see called "Finding Nemo." :-)
Nope. That was good effort but still looked computer generated. With the exception of the dinosaurs, there were several points during this movie that I forgot I was watching animation.
Natalie
INTERCOT Staff: Disneyland Resort-California, The Water Cooler
Mendelson;2474621 wrote: On Rotten Tomatoes it currently sits at 77 percent. The only ones worse are Cars 2, naturally, and Cars, at 74 percent - but I would argue Cars is far, far better than The Good Dinosaur.
Cars is very underrated. It is a wonderful story and has huge appeal. Cars 2 had NO redeeming qualities whatsoever. It is Pixar's absolute worst product, hands down.
Natalie
INTERCOT Staff: Disneyland Resort-California, The Water Cooler
BrerGnat;2474628 wrote: Cars is very underrated. It is a wonderful story and has huge appeal. Cars 2 had NO redeeming qualities whatsoever. It is Pixar's absolute worst product, hands down.
I enjoyed Cars 2 well enough (certainly more than the trash that is Wall-E, IMO). People enjoy movies for different reasons.
